Post by account_disabled on Dec 30, 2023 23:14:29 GMT -5
Aentitled to a financial allowance corresponding to this additional period. On the other hand it is up to the Member States to determine the conditions of this grant. Leave a reply Your email address will not be published. Mandatory fields are marked with Comment Name Email Site web Save my name email and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Recommended artThe acquisition of a competitor by a dominant is not automatically an abuse of position Competition law minutes Tasia Apostu January The Belgian competition authority confirms that the acquisition of a small competitor by a dominant competitor is not automatically an abuse of a dominant position.
On November the Belgian Competition Authority rejected the request for Country Email List interim measures brought by Alken Maes AM the second brewer on the Belgian beer market against AnbeuserBush Imber ABI the number participant and according to the provisional decision the dominant participant. The request relates to ABIs acquisition of the Bosteels brewery which has a significant number of beer experts beer tasters in its portfolio notably the Karmeliet brand. The acquisition remained subject to notification relating to the limits imposed by Belgian merger control. However AM filed a complaint arguing that the operation amounted to an abuse of the dominant position held by ABI Art. . of the.
Economic Code AM requested provisional measures to suspend the takeover of Busteels by ABI. r i measures was admissible but unfounded. Referring to the judgment of the Court of Justice regarding Continental Can the BCA admitted that mergers can in principle give rise to an abuse of a dominant position. He stressed the idea that the analysis of such operations is first of all subject to the merger control regime with fixed dates but warned about the possible harmful effects of the imposition of provisional measures in such a context. In this situation.
On November the Belgian Competition Authority rejected the request for Country Email List interim measures brought by Alken Maes AM the second brewer on the Belgian beer market against AnbeuserBush Imber ABI the number participant and according to the provisional decision the dominant participant. The request relates to ABIs acquisition of the Bosteels brewery which has a significant number of beer experts beer tasters in its portfolio notably the Karmeliet brand. The acquisition remained subject to notification relating to the limits imposed by Belgian merger control. However AM filed a complaint arguing that the operation amounted to an abuse of the dominant position held by ABI Art. . of the.
Economic Code AM requested provisional measures to suspend the takeover of Busteels by ABI. r i measures was admissible but unfounded. Referring to the judgment of the Court of Justice regarding Continental Can the BCA admitted that mergers can in principle give rise to an abuse of a dominant position. He stressed the idea that the analysis of such operations is first of all subject to the merger control regime with fixed dates but warned about the possible harmful effects of the imposition of provisional measures in such a context. In this situation.