Post by etikhatun669911 on May 1, 2024 22:43:56 GMT -5
These are the only 9 companies with this specific goal, but of them only the German bank Commerzbank has a deadline to reach the goal, saying that it aims to: "acquire 100% green electricity from our new hydroelectric plants in Norway between 2013 and 2015. »
also have ambitious goals to reduce their carbon emissions, but they approach them differently. For example, Tesco wants to be “zero carbon” by 2050 and Unilever aims to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of its products by 2020. For its part, Microsoft has already achieved its goal of having data centers, software development laboratories , offices and air travel of its neutral collaborators.
Despite the advances of this handful of companies, it Brazil Email List is still easy to identify leaders in an industry because there are very few organizations that are creating scientific goals and transparently reporting their achievements.Companies are a constant target of criticism. Not all of them are reasonable but many end up resulting in changes in policies, structure or executives, without taking into account the cost in terms of reputation . What can companies do that want to avoid all this? According to a new Harvard Business Review article, the answer lies in turning your board members into activists.
According to authors Ram Charan, Michael Useem and Dennis Carey, this is a good time to renew the council, since activist investors have achieved big victories against American companies in recent years. For example, they managed to replace all board members at Darden Restaurants, the country's largest restaurant operator, after directors took a course that many owners opposed.
By including on the board people who "exercise independent oversight and are deeply interested in long-term corporate strategy" you can ensure better corporate governance and therefore better results, the authors say. "Instead of expecting an activist force to forcibly include its agents in the council (...) why not have a leader, such as the director or head of the council, who anticipates these events?"
In the article the authors refer to both financial and logistical issues within the company, but the same can be applied to social responsibility issues. Why not include experts on this topic, people with experience who can see the criticism before it arrives? Such thinking would have saved some headaches for companies that have been targeted by campaigns by Greenpeace or other organizations, and the change would have been on the company's terms from the beginning.
also have ambitious goals to reduce their carbon emissions, but they approach them differently. For example, Tesco wants to be “zero carbon” by 2050 and Unilever aims to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of its products by 2020. For its part, Microsoft has already achieved its goal of having data centers, software development laboratories , offices and air travel of its neutral collaborators.
Despite the advances of this handful of companies, it Brazil Email List is still easy to identify leaders in an industry because there are very few organizations that are creating scientific goals and transparently reporting their achievements.Companies are a constant target of criticism. Not all of them are reasonable but many end up resulting in changes in policies, structure or executives, without taking into account the cost in terms of reputation . What can companies do that want to avoid all this? According to a new Harvard Business Review article, the answer lies in turning your board members into activists.
According to authors Ram Charan, Michael Useem and Dennis Carey, this is a good time to renew the council, since activist investors have achieved big victories against American companies in recent years. For example, they managed to replace all board members at Darden Restaurants, the country's largest restaurant operator, after directors took a course that many owners opposed.
By including on the board people who "exercise independent oversight and are deeply interested in long-term corporate strategy" you can ensure better corporate governance and therefore better results, the authors say. "Instead of expecting an activist force to forcibly include its agents in the council (...) why not have a leader, such as the director or head of the council, who anticipates these events?"
In the article the authors refer to both financial and logistical issues within the company, but the same can be applied to social responsibility issues. Why not include experts on this topic, people with experience who can see the criticism before it arrives? Such thinking would have saved some headaches for companies that have been targeted by campaigns by Greenpeace or other organizations, and the change would have been on the company's terms from the beginning.